Facts about Communalism and Markaz

Carona virus has not been brought and I am not saying this unnecessarily, rather I have evidence which makes me believe that Karona virus has not come to India but has been brought. Read the full post and decide for yourself.

 According to BBC News, from January 2020 to March 2020, about 336 flights from abroad came to India.  In which China, Iran and Italy were specially sent planes to bring their citizens.

 According to the statement of Luv Agarwal and Dr Raman Gangakhadekar in Dainik Jagran newspaper of 27/03/20, more than 64,000 people came to India from abroad.
 Link

 https://www.patrika.com/miscellenous-india/health-ministry-says-64000-people-from-abroad-after-21-march-covid19-5931129/

 Only 8 thousand people have been kept out of it, and the rest are in community services.
 Whose numbers are around 56,000?

 The first patient of the carona virus in India was found in Kerala on January 30
 Who was studying Dr.'s teachings in Wuhan city of China, India had come back, this was the first death in India due to the carona virus .....
  Link
 https://aajtak.intoday.in/story/india-examining-all-options-to-provide-relief-to-indians-stuck-in-wuhan-death-toll-in-china-corona-virus-1-  1158406.html

 As of January 23, 60 students from China had arrived in India without any investigation.
 When this carona virus caught on in Wuhan city of China, about 700 students from India were studying in Wuhan studying Dr., there was a panic.
 Remembering all these families, you started telling the past.
 Keep in mind that they were the children of all the capitalists.

 In a hurry, the central government in Wuhan city of China
 (Crop)
 (Hotlines) were issued for the children of 700 capitalists ... The total number was 3.

 (1) 8618612083617
 (2) 8618610952903
 (3) 8618612083629
 On these three hotlines, about 600 calls were received from Wuhan city of China.

 On 27 January 2020, an Air India Boeing B-747 aircraft with a capacity of 423 passengers was dispatched to fetch 250 Indian students in Wuhan city, China.

 After this, the second Air India aircraft with a capacity of 366 passengers were sent again to bring the rest of the students.

 A team of 5 Drs has also been sent to conduct a medical examination of these students.
 Who were those 5 Drs, what kit did they have to check for the carona virus ..... ????
 secret .........

 According to the statement of India's Ambassador to China, Vikram Mistry, no Indian student is infected with this coronavirus.

 Consider their description.

 After this, the first patient of the carona virus was found in India on January 30 in Kerala. The first student from China Wuhan, who died in India.

 After this, the second Carona-affected student also came out of the same students who returned to China from Wuhan city after studying Dr.

 Until then, the central government did not lockdown, no rail, bus service was stopped ..... Why ....?

 By the second week of March, 133 luxury aircraft landed in India with a fare of ₹ 90 lakhs.

 In which many people of Indian origin from China Italy Iran came back to India, instead of keeping them in the centre for 14 days, they were allowed to go to their homes, remember that at that time the Karona virus was on its rise in Italy and Iran.

 In India, the carona virus continued to enter India in large numbers by the children of NRIs and industrialists silently.

  When the whole world was taking precaution about Karona virus

 On 24 February 2020, US President Donald Trump came on a two-day visit to India, the first event was held at a stadium in Ahmedabad, Gujarat where millions of people were present along with India's celebrities.
 What did Modi & Co. then do to prevent carona virus ……. ??????

 It cost 100 crores rupees to complete this program, which committee of the Government of India spent this money, do not know… ???

 Donald Trump came to Delhi after Agra.
 Thousands of security personnel and the entire government administration, the entire cabinet kept coming without any medical security.

 The advisory was issued by Dr Randeep Guleria, Director, AIIMS, in Dainik Jagran on Holi festival on 10 March,
 It was also written in the same newspaper that the Carona virus spread from Jammu to Kerala

 This Dainik Jagran had its own view, that for Holi, the year-long festival, do not be afraid of the Carona virus at all.

 On 13 March, the central government itself said that there is no need to fear the Carona virus.

 On 13 March, the number of people infected with Carona virus in India reached 60.
 --------------------------------------------------  ----------
 A list takes a look at the following religious programs and other programs in India.
 --------------------------------------------------  -------------
 On 13 March 2020, Kanika Kapoor performed at her maternal uncle's house in Kanpur Nagar, by March 13,14,15, many of the party had come in contact with about 400 people.

 The convention began in Nizamuddin on 14 March 2020 in Markaz.
 Nizamuddin Markaz's session ended on 15 March 2020.

 Cow urine party from Hindu Mahasabha on 16 March 2020

 On 16 March 2020, the Delhi government closed all religious places.

 On 17 March 2020, there were 40,000 people in Tirupati.

 Also on 18 March 2020 in Tirupati for the second day
 There were about 40,000 people,

 There was a similar crowd in the Sai temple.

 8500 people had registered in Vaishno Devi from 5 am to 2 pm,
 Even after the information of the Central Government, he was allowed to go for darshan.

 Nearly all religious places in India were crowded.

 The temples of Vaishno Devi including Tirupati were closed on 19 March 2020.
  Till 21 March, no attempt was made to make people aware of Karona virus.
 Fairs and markets are being organized Picture halls and malls are open to all the public

 Janata Curfew was imposed on 22 March 2020.

 On this day, Modi appealed to the people of India to play thali and clap from their homes at 5 pm.
 After that people descended into the hundreds in thousands
 DM, SP was involved in this foolish act.

 DM, SP was also suspended.
 But their supporters and this enthusiastic crowd openly supported by the police.

 On 23 March 2020, Shivraj Singh organized the swearing-in ceremony in Madhya Pradesh along with the entire cabinet.

 The lock-down was implemented from midnight of 24 March 2020 at a gap of just 4 hours between 23 March 2020 and 24 March.

 On March 25, Uttar Pradesh Chief Minister Yogi Adityanath, with full security, along with hundreds of his supporters, went to Ram temple in Ayodhya, worshipped and came to Papas.

 The lockdown is implemented from midnight of 24 March 2020 when the matter gets out of hand.
 One type of emergency can be applied.
 --------------------------------------------------  -----------------
 Why do you think the Hindu-Muslim form has been given.
 Before that, let me tell you about two religions.
 The status quo was almost identical, but know how Hindu-Muslim was formed due to discriminatory attitude ...........
 --------------------------------------------------  -----------------
 You will know that there was news of 400 devotees (crops) in Vaishno Devi.
 What is the whole matter?
 Vaishno Devi Management is informed on 18 March 2020 on behalf of the Central Government.
 That the Vaishno Devi temple should be closed due to Carona virus.

 But before receiving this information, 8500 people had been registered for darshan from 5 am to 2 pm on 18 March 20, according to the statement of the Vaishno Devi temple managers, after refusing to visit after the registration  Can not be stopped

 Nearly all the people went to Bapas, but 400 people from Bihar went (Fas).
 Because it takes two to three days to see Vaishno Devi and come to Bapus.

 You must have gone on 18 March 20, it would have been 20 or 21 March by the time the Bapu's came, the public curfew was implemented from 22 March.

 After that, continued till the evening of 23 March, the lockdown was implemented for 21 days at an interval of only 4 hours, do not know whether they would have found any means in these 4 hours.
 All 400 people of Bihar (Fas) went, would have worked as long as the money would have been, then after that, where they stayed, their owners started pressuring them to vacate the place.

 Hearing this, local justice friend Monica Kohli and her fellow lawyers filed a petition in the Jammu High Court.
 For the first time in the history of the High Court of Jammu and Kashmir, Chief Justice Dish Geeta Mittal and second Judge Sindhu Sharma heard the arguments of Monika Kohli and other lawyers while hearing from the instant video conferencing.
 All these proceedings are Chief Justice
 Stay in your house
 During the hearing, the two judges gave an 11-page decision.

 The Jammu and Kashmir High Court on Monday 30/03/2020 directed the Union Territory authorities to make arrangements to ensure that all these 400 pilgrims from Bihar are not evacuated from the hotels along with their food, water and other facilities.

 Link
 https://khabar.ndtv.com/news/faith/hc-directs-jk-authorities-to-ensure-proper-shelter-to-400-pilgrims-stranded-at-vaishno-devi-shrine-2203341

 This is the favour of the Hindus
 --------------------------------------------------  ---------------
 Now the other side also talks about the Muslim.
        -------------------------------------------------
  Many people will not know.
 At this time Nizamuddin Markaz is loudly in discussion all over the country.
 The biggest reason for this is the dock media.

 (Mark) Many people will not be familiar with the word.
 The word Markaz means the place from where advisories are issued for all mosques.
 Or to say in other words, the headquarters are in every city.

 It is not only in the country but also abroad.  Biggest mosque
 Tablighi Jamaat or (Jamati) of Markaz
 Jamati is the people who do the work of giving information about the religion of Islam, how to read Namaz, what are the drawbacks.
 Or in simple words, people who give correct information about religion.

 The Markaz session began on 13 March 20 and ended on 15 March.
 So where did all these people stop ……… ????
 Wait, like me you too got confused ...........
 Having a session is a different thing and gathering is a different thing.

 This is a 100-year-old tradition, it is a tradition not only in India but all over the world.
 Jamati stays for 30 days to 4 months, where they have to give information about religion, it is also said by the merciful mosque.

 That's why these 1400 gathering people stayed.
 It is not that their stay in one place was not given to the police station or SDM.

 If a traveller from abroad comes to India, his account remains with the government, where he is and for how long.

 On 16 March, the Delhi government prohibits more than 50 persons from depositing.
 # Thereafter Section 144 is imposed on 21 March.
 # Jan 22 Curfew applies.
 # Lockdown on 24 March.
 # On March 25, Maulana Yusuf, son of Markz's manager Maulana Shad, requests the police and the SDM to arrange to send all these people home by informing them by writing a letter.

 # Due to this death, a person dies in Tamil Nadu, the cause of death is still unknown.

 # On 29 March, Markz letter also writes to the Commissioner of Delhi.

 A person involved in #Markaz dies.

 But there is a police station just a hundred meters away from Markaz, the police keep sleeping.

 # Why no action was taken on the letter given on 25 March ... ????

 # On 25 March, the Tehsildar visited the building and SDM also reached Markaz on 26 March, WHO team also visited Markaz on 28 March.

 On March 27, March 6 and March 28, 33 people were sent to the hospital for examination.
 Whether or not the foreigners contacted their embassy in Markaz (hidden) or (trapped) is not yet clear.

 It was given a religious colour under a well thought out plot.

 There is a news from Telangana, 6 people who returned from Nizamuddin Markaz have died due to the Karona virus, after which Zee News Republic TV9, including Bharatvarsha, vied to make Markaz a hangout of traitors in all Hindi language riot channels.

 Half the incomplete information was spread by virus media, presenting it as a story.

 Do foreigners hide in Nizamuddin even after giving information in the police station?  But foreign devotees are trapped in Vaishno Devi

 The result of which is that the Muslim Delhi violence, which did not break down while sitting in Shaheen Bagh, has been done to break this false story.

 The lock-down due to the Carona virus has seen the highest number of Muslims helping the poor.

 The same thing is enough to spoil the presence of a few people of Hindu Muslim politics.
 --------------------------------------------------  -----
 The purpose of keeping the point of both sides is that one got everything without saying anything to the judiciary.
 But even after informing the other party, guilty of spreading this Carona virus was accepted without knowing the truth.
 --------------------------------------------------  -------------
 Modi's media behind raising the issue of Mark
   Do not divert attention from recent events

 After the lockdown, the situation of starving people in front of them creates food and food becomes expensive.

 A large number of people travel on foot to their homes and there is no provision to bring people home from the government and 29 people die on the way home

  In spite of being a PM Relief Fund, Modi's new PM Crash Fund to be created which has no accounts and is owned by only 3 persons.
 Amit Shah, Rajnath Singh Nirmala Sitharaman All three are personal trustees of this trust?
 This issue has been made loud in social media

  In India, due to shortage of Karona virus medical equipment, selling medical equipment ventilators to other countries, India does not have 1 lakh ventilator whereas India needs 6 lakh ventilators in view of the Karona virus epidemic.

 https://www.ndtv.com/india-news/india-sends-covid-19-protective-gear-to-serbia-amid-huge-shortage-at-home-2203900?pfrom=home-bigstory&fbclid=IwAR2iVX9ujQZCZVXKBZXXBXXXBXXXXBXXXXXBXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXYXXXXXXXXXXYZXXYZKXZZKXZZKZZZZZZKZZZZZZKZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZYZZZZZZZZZZZZZZYZYZYZYZYZYZZ
 --------------------------------------------------  --------------
 Let me tell you what the dock media has done.
 Subhash Chandra is a news channel of BJP MP.
 Whose name is Zee News
 Watch their handiwork
 Telling in the news on their news channel that this mark
 Where did 1684 people leave and go all over India ……
 It is obvious that this list must have been received from Mark.
 This means that the people of Markaz had read their writings.  Marks keep a record of the movements of every mob

 The list is as follows ……
 Himachal - 86
 Punjab - 09
 Rajasthan - 156
 Maharashtra - 109
 Karnataka - 45
 Kerala - 15
 Haryana - 22
 Uttarakhand - 34
 Meghalaya - 05
 Ranchi - 46
 West Bengal - 156
 Assam - 216
 Bihar - 86
 Madhya Pradesh - 107
 Odisha - 15
 Tamil Nadu - 501
 Hyderabad - 55
 Andaman Nicobar - 21

 1684 people in total

 I agree with this news channel, right.
 So is this news channel in Wuhan city of China from where this carona virus originated.

 600 students from there, Kanika Kapoor, lakhs of people from Kerala, Rajasthan, and other religious places have gone to their places of residence, who can tell where and how many have gone…. ???

 If yes, in the same way their list should be released ..... if not ........ ?????
 So why is it justice to impose all the blame on the Muslim society, while openly supporting the capitalists in the society by making this discriminatory behaviour…………… ?????,

Suhaib Rumi, the prominent companion of the Prophet:

Suhaib was a prominent companion of the Prophet Muhammad, he is famous with the name of suhaib Rumi, before Islam he spent some years as a slave. Several ayat of the Quran descended about him, he used to live in Makkah, there was his own slaves, property etc. Once he planned to migrate from Makkah to Madina, in between the way to Madina he was gripped by a powerful man and wanted to bring him back to Makkah, he requested and said I am giving you my all property in exchange to free me and let me go to Madina, they agreed, when he reached in rendezvous of the Prophet Muhammad PBH, the prophet said: you have done so good deal. then this Ayat revealed: And among the people is he who sells his soul seeking the pleasure of Allah, and Allah is most kind to his servants. (Suratul_baqrah:270)
He was nearest to the Umar bin Al-Khattab, the second Caliph of the Prophet Muhammad PBUH.
Suhayb was nominated by the caliph Umar ibn al-Khattab to lead the Muslims in prayers for some time.
As Umar lay dying after being stabbed by Abu-Lu'lu'ah on November 1, 644, he summoned Uthman ibn Affan, Ali, Talhah, Zubayr ibn al-Awam, Abdur Rahman bin Awf, and Sa`d ibn Abi Waqqas and instructed them to consult among themselves and with the Muslims for three days and choose a successor.
In this brief intermediate period before Uthman’s appointment, Suhayb was responsible for leading prayers.
The Prophet described love for him necessary for faith. He said: Whoever has faith in God and Last Day should love him like a mother loves her child.
A Persian  poet said:
حسن ز بصرہ بلال از حبش صہیب از روم
زخاک مکہ ابوجہل این چہ بوالعجبی است

Some fake news against Tablighi Jamaat in social media

 First: - The video throwing spit by Jamati turned out to be an old incident in Mumbai. It had nothing to do with Markaz.  The video licking the dishes was also fake.

 Second: - Absolute allegations of tampering of nurses by Jamati in isolation, so far no evidence has been found.

 Third: - There was a ruckus when Jamati did not get non-veg food and the news was defecated in the open and the local police administration also informed about this.

 Fourth: - In Indore, two Hindus were also arrested along with Muslims for expelling doctors and nurses and throwing stones at the police.

 Fifth: - In Rewa, Madhya Pradesh, the news of the police officer Abid Khan beating the priest on the ground and beating it also turned out to be wrong.

 Sixth: - The old man selling fruits in Madhya Pradesh was also mentally ill, this video was also old.  It had nothing to do with spreading the corona.

 Satma: - On commenting on the Tablighi Jamaat in Allahabad, Mohammad Sona and his associates killed Lotan Nishad.  It turned out to be wrong, the local police administration itself gave this information.

 Much such fake news is being spread for propaganda.  Media, news anchors, IT cell, are working day and night in support of the government.  So that their failure should be hidden behind Muslim society.

 I do not believe that Muslims do not commit crimes. We have to be alert when selective propaganda goes on.  But until we prove such propaganda wrong, negative neuter has reached every corner of the country.  If a Muslim makes a mistake, punish him twice. But fake news makes no sense to run propaganda.

 We too have no grief to write on social media, but people who are very Hindu friends for whom they can give anything, are also overwhelmed by these negative thoughts.  And start questioning the whole religion.  Hearing abuse on fake news, the mind is bursting.

 If you have a link to the fact check of any fake news given above, then you can take it in the comment box. Share this post, paste the copy without asking.  Put on Whatsapp status and Instagram story.

 Remember, we have social media as a medium through which people can spread even the hidden truth behind this fake news.

 From Md Rehan Shakeel Bhai's pen, ❤️
 From Acharya Sahil Bhai's Wall ,

سجدے میں دعاء

کیا سجدے میں جاکر اللہ پاک سے دعا مانگنا بدعت ہے؟ اور اگر ایسا ہے، تو دعا مانگنے کا سنت طریقہ بتائیں؟ اور اگر سجدے میں دعا مانگ سکتے ہیں تو کب اور کیسے مانگے؟

Published on: Feb 26, 2018

جواب # 159005

بسم الله الرحمن الرحيم

Fatwa: 598-542/M=6/1439

نماز کے بعد دعا مانگنے کے لیے لوگوں کے سامنے الگ سے سجدہ نہ کیا جائے، کیوں کہ ناواقف لوگ اسے دیکھ کر سنت یا واجب سمجھنے لگیں گے، اسی لیے فقہاء نے اس کو مکروہ قرار دیا ہے، درمختار میں ہے: لکنہا تکرہ بعد الصلاة لأن الجہلة یعتقدونہا سنة أو واجبة (شامي) ہاں نفل نماز کے سجدے میں دعا مانگ سکتے ہیں، لیکن شرط ہے کہ عربی میں ہو اور بہتر ہے کہ ماثور دعائیں ہوں اور دعا مانگنے کا افضل طریقہ یہ ہے کہ نماز کے بعد دونوں ہاتھ سینہ بالمقابل اٹھاکر خشوع وخضوع کے ساتھ دعا مانگی جائے۔

واللہ تعالیٰ اعلم

دارالافتاء،
دارالعلوم دیوبند

سوال: نوافل کے سجدوں میں کس کس طرح کی دعائیں کرسکتے ہیں؟
سجدوں کی مسنون دعاؤں کے علاوہ دیگر ماثورہ دعائیں کی جاسکتی ہیں؟ خاص دنیاوی حاجت کی دعائیں غیرعربی زبان میں دعائیں کی جاسکتی ہیں؟
جزاکم اللہ خیرا

فتویٰ نمبر:177

وعلیکم السلام ورحمته الله وبرکاته!

نفلی نماز اور سنت مئوکده نماز کے سجده میں آپ دعا کرسکتیہیں  درست اور صحیح ہے
حضرت ابوہریره رضی الله عںه سے مروی ہے کہ  آپ صلی الله علیه وآله وسلم نے فرمایا بنده اپنے رب سے اس وقت زیاده قریب ہوتا ہے جب وه ” سجده ” میں ہو  پس ( حالت سجده ) خوب دعا کیا کرو.
صحیح مسلم:ج1 ص191 ، مشکوته شریف:84

نوٹ:  سجده میں دعا سے مراد ” نفل و سنت ” نمازوں کے سجده میں دعا کرنا ہے
اسی طرح سے ” تهجد یا اوابین ” وغیره یه بهی نفل نمازیں ہیں  اس میں بهی خوب دعا کیا کریں
بہتر یہ ہے کہ  قرآنی آیت و احادیث میں وارد شده دعائیں کیا کرے یعنی منقول و مسنون دعائیں کیا کرے صرف عربی زبان میں کرے.
عربی زبان کے علاوہ کسی اور زبان میں اجازت نہیں ہے.
مستقل الگ سے سجده میں دعاوں کی بهی اجازتہے  کبهی کبهی کرے اور مستقل الک سے صرف سجده میں دعا کرنے کو ( عادت ) نہ  بنائے اور اس صورت میں عربی زبان کی بهی قید نہیں ہے .
ہمارےفقہائے احناف نے نماز کے بعد دعا کرنے کے بعد سجده میں جاکر دعا کرنے کو ( مکروه ) لکهاہے آج کل مساجد میں عوام الناس میں سے بعض لوگوں کو دیکها جاسکتا ہے وه اس طرح کرتے رہتے ہیں ( فتاوی عالمگیری میں بهی اس کی ممانعت ہے )
لہذا اس کی عادت نہ  بنائے نہ ہی  اسے سنت سمجهے ورنہ یہ  عمل بهی بدعت میں شمار هوگا
البتہ  اپنے گهر میں یا کهی اور کبهی دل میں آیا کر لیا تو گنجائش ہے
ولمافی احسن الفتاوی :ج2 ص26

والله اعلم بالصواب

میڈیا اور سیاست کانفرت انگیز پروپیگنڈہ

*#میڈیا اور سیاست کا نفرت انگیز پروپیگنڈہ*
 آج شام 7 بجے سے حکومت اور میڈیا کی مہم کے خلاف تیار رہیں: 

 آج شام 7 بجے سے، کاروان امن و انصاف CPJ کی سوشل میڈیا یونٹ، جماعت اسلامی کی SiO اور یونائیٹڈ اگینسٹ ہیٹ UAH متحدہ طورپر میڈیا اور حکومت کے سیاسی پروپیگنڈے کے خلاف سوشل میڈیا پر حقائق کے لیے بیداری کی مہم چلائیں گے 

 حکومت نے اچانک لاک ڈاؤن کرکے سب کو پریشانی میں ڈال دیا، بعدازاں حکومت نے ہی اعلان کیا کہ جو جہاں ہے وہیں رک جائے تبلیغی جماعت کی اصلاحی تحریک کا عالمی سینٹر مرکز نظام الدین ہے، ایسے میں لاک ڈاؤن کی وجہ سے وہاں پر موجود تبلیغی جماعت کے لوگ اچانک پھنس گئے.
 تبلیغی جماعت کے ذمہ داروں نے امانت داری اور حکومت سے تعاون کا ثبوت دیتے ہوئے نظام الدین کی طرف سے دہلی حکومت اور ایڈمنسٹریشن کو خط بھی لکھا اور اپیل بھی کی، کہ، ان کے مرکز میں لاک ڈاؤن کی وجہ سے لوگ پھنس گئے ہیں انہیں منتقل کرنے کا کوئی نظم کریں، لیکن حکومت نے کچھ نہیں کیا اور مرکز میں لوگوں کو پھنسے رہنے دیا.
 پھر جب لاکھوں مزدور دہلی کی سڑکوں پر اتر گئے، غلط لاک ڈاؤن کی وجہ مرکزی اور دہلی کی صوبائی کیجریوال گورنمنٹ کی ناکامیاں میڈیا میں چھاگئی چاروں طرف سے تھو تھو ہونے لگی، تو چالاکی سے حکومت نے مرکز پر میڈیا کے ساتھ دھاوا بول دیا اور مزدوروں، غریبوں کا ایشو دبا کر ہندو مسلم کارڈ کھیلنا شروع کردیاہے، اور اب بدترین سیاست کرتے ہوئے کرونا کے نام پر میڈیا کے ذریعے گھٹیا متعصبانہ سیاست کھیل رہے ہیں اصل زمینی انسانی بحران سے توجه ہٹانے کے لیے تبلیغی جماعت اور مرکز نظام الدین کے نام پر کرونا کو مسلمانوں کے خلاف بھڑکانے کے لیے استعمال کررہےہیں، اور اب ملک گیر پیمانے پر تبلیغی جماعت کےخلاف سرکاری پابندی کا مطالبہ ہورہاہے،.
 یہ ہے پوری سیاسی پینترے بازی جو ہوم منسٹری اور کیجریوال گورنمنٹ اس وقت کھیل رہےہیں.

 اس پروپیگنڈے کو توڑنا بہت ضروری ہے، سچائی سب کے سامنے لانے کے لیے سوشل میڈیا ہے، اس کے ذریعے حکومتوں کی گھٹیا سیاست کو ایکسپوز کرنا ضروری ہے،.

Tablighi Jamaat

In the early 1920s, Maulana Mohammad Ilyas kandhlavi prepared a team of young madrasah graduates from Deoband and Saharanpur and sent them to Mewat to establish a network of mosques and Islamic schools movement. He once said that if he had to attribute a name to his movement, it would have been Tehreek-e-Imaan('Imaan/Faith movement'). The people of South Asia started calling the devotees Tableeghi and this name eventually became popular among the common people.
The Centre( or in Urdu Markaz )of the Tablighi jamaat is Masjid Bangla wali, at Basti Hazrat Nizamuddin, New Delhi. Mewat region people were the first companions of Maulana Muhammad Ilyas kandhlavi in this work. After Maulana Muhammad Ilyas death in 19 44, his son Maulana Mohammed Yusuf kandhlavi became second Amir or Hazratji of the Jamaat. Maulana Mohammad Yusuf was a great scholar, he wrote a number of authentic books about the companions of the Prophet PBUH in the Arabic language. His other books are as under Sharh Maani Alaasar, (شرح معانی الآثار)Hayatus Sahabah, (حیاۃ الصحابہ)Muntakhab Ahadees(منتخب احادیث). After his death in 1965, the 3rd Amir or Hazrat Ji became Maulana Inaamul Hassan kandhlavi, after his death in 1995, a short council comprised on Maulana Mohammad Zubair, (son of Maulana Inaamul Hasan), and Maulana Muhammad Saad (great-grandson of Maulana Mohammad Illyas kandhlavi )and others. All of the Shoora council members have died with the passage of time, now just Maulana Saad is alone member remaining, most members of the jamaat agreed with the presidentship of Maulana Saad, Some old members of the Jamaat separated from Maulana Saad, most noteworthy of them is a Maulana Ahmad Lath, who is now living in a mosque of Ajmairi gate Delhi.
Newest matter of Coronavirus in the Nizamuddin Markaz:
Some of the facts about Delhi Nizamuddin Tablighi Jamaat Markaz (centre) should be understood by everyone directly in the easy alphabet.
 1- Nizamuddin Police Station is very close to Nizamuddin Markaz so close that even if someone sneezes in the Markaz, the voice will come to the police station so nothing can be done there.

 2- In Nizamuddin, this mark is already established freely and all these activities have been conducted since then.

 3- Every year, Nizamuddin Markaz always has thousands of people gathered all the time because Markaz definitely comes from all over the world coming and going.

 4- There is never any special conference or event in Nizamuddin, there is the same daily routine which always goes on.

 5 - The people who gathered in Nizamuddin Markaz were there before Lockdown after Lockdown neither did any gathering there nor did anyone go from there.

 6- Nizamuddin Markaz and Nizamuddin have always had good coordination and a sense of co-operation in local administration.

 7-Even today with the same cooperation and co-ordination everything is going to be investigated.

 8- In Nizamuddin Markaz, not a single gathering of people trapped in Lockdown is clearly found corona positive.
   The rest of the media sprang up an issue, the fools caught up and rubbed the fool in their mouths.
 Note - I am not defensive at all, just tell the facts carefully.

Hind, Sindh and Islam

Hind is India in the Arabic language, and Sind means Sindh located now in Pakistan. Both historically and geographically attach each other, but both are different regions. Once they were in a country before the partition of India in 1947. Now Hind is separated from Sindh located in Pakistan. Islam came in India By the way of Sindh, by famous Arabic Gernel Mohamed Bin Qasim was in teenage. In Arabic, there is a famous book on the topic by Qazi Athar Mubarakpuri, printed and published in Cairo: Personalities of India and Sindh(رجال السند والهند)

Al-Hajjaj bin Yusuf Al thaqafi uncle of Muhammad bin Qasim and the governor of Kufa gave Muhammad command of the expedition between 708 and 711, when Muhammad was only 15–17 years old, apparently because two previous Umayyad commanders had not been successful in punishing Sindh's ruler Raja Dahir for his failure to prevent pirates from disrupting Muslim shipping off the coast of Sindh.

Appeal to the lockdown:

All mosques of the world are closed, all Ulemas are asking people to stay at their home don't go to prayer for mosques. Just azan is being called no prayer is being performed in the mosques. Muslim personal law board, Owaisi, Other Islamic scholars strongly directed to the Muslims “stay and pray at home don't go to perform prayer at mosques.”

The killing of innocent Sikhs is a heinous crime:

The killing of innocent Sikhs in a Kabul Gurdwara on 25 March 2020 by terrorists is a heinous crime against humanity. The so-called Islamic State is a real enemy with an Islamic name, and those are patronizing such terrorists indeed they are also enemies of Muslims and Islam. Indeed Islam has no place for terrorism, terrorists and innocent’s killing anywhere else in the world. Quran says: “whoever kills a soul, without(it's being guilty of)manslaughter or corruption on the earth, is as though he had killed all mankind, and whoever saves a life is as though he had saved all mankind.” (Suratul Maaidah:32)

Closing Mosques – Islamic Justifications for Coronavirus Lockdowns

Posted by: Shaykh Sajid Umar in Islamic Law, Islamic Thought, Latest, Latest Islamic, Opinion2 days ago 0

Introduction

We are living in an unprecedented time. Superpowers have become overwhelmed by the tiny virus particle Covid-19, turning bustling metropolises into ghost towns, grounding planes and closing airports, with hundreds dying daily and some of the most advanced healthcare systems in the world grinding to a halt.

This unprecedented situation has led to the unprecedented move of the world’s mosques being closed to the public for the first time—en masse—since Bilāl (Allāh be pleased with him) first raised the call to prayer over 1400 years ago. It is indeed a sign of Īmān for this to hurt us, as the believers are connected to the Houses of Allāh, and their closure has stirred many emotions.

It is important in times like these not to let these emotions get hijacked by Shaytān, who has tried to use the Coronavirus pandemic to sow seeds of discord among the Muslims. One of the most insidious traps of Iblīs is to cause us to lose respect and love for each other, particularly for the scholars and leaders of our communities, thereby blocking the mercy of Allāh from reaching us.

The closing of a masjid is a matter of local jurisdiction. My personal opinion, one way or another, is not relevant in a matter that is up to responsible, knowledgeable scholarship in respective regions to decide based on their own scenarios. I could in fact be sinful for commenting on a specific decision taken by the leaders of a specific congregation, and even more sinful if my comments create unnecessary drama between congregations and their leaders.

However, I have been inundated with questions and arguments about the situation, from people for and against the closure of mosques, and I believe it would be beneficial for all of us to understand the matter at hand, to foster understanding of the reasoning behind the closure of mosques taken by scholars across many countries, and to highlight the fact that the scholars who hold different views are in fact in agreement on the major principles involved.

Furthermore it is important to appreciate that the decision to close mosques was a decision WITHIN the Islamic legal field, not due to the false dichotomy some have spread of the ‘medical’ vs ‘Islamic’ considerations. People with a particular interest or expertise are naturally inclined to giving that disproportionate weight. However, as we will see, the Islamic jurist in fact has to take into account ALL relevant angles—which is partly why there is more scope for disagreements—including the medical, economic, mental health, spiritual, political and hereafter angles.

This is thus a delicate ijtihādi matter juggling various competing considerations, which should attract from us the highest level of adab(manners).

There is more agreement than disagreement

Both those who opined for and against full closure of mosques agree that an objective of the Sharia is the preservation of life. They both agree on the principle that prevention of harm takes precedence over gaining benefit. They both agree that out of two necessary harmful choices, one has to choose the lesser of two harms to avert the greater one.

They both agree that Allāh has gifted this ummah the unique gift of the entire earth being pure and a place of prayer in general, with certain places attracting more reward than others. They both agree that closing the masjid is no small matter, but a massive, catastrophic one.

They both agree that if you follow scholarly opinions of trusted scholars and scholarly bodies, you will not be sinful. And they both agree that if you are prevented from your usual ‘ibādah such as praying in the mosques, you will still be rewarded for them.

It is important to remember this, because we naturally ignore the majority area of agreement and focus on relatively small matters of disagreement. But why do those disagreements occur?

Differences occur in the micro-matters; of juggling the various ethical considerations (masālih), their respective implementation in real life, and the analysis and weighing of various harms—whether ‘major’ or ‘minor’, for example. Scholars differ due to their personal reasoning and understanding, since Allāh has created us all with different personalities and dispositions, so we naturally interpret a situation in different ways.

This is partly why large-scale decisions should be made by numbers of jurists coming together, mitigating each other’s variations, the pinnacle of which is Ijmā’ (unanimous consensus), which is a binding proof of what Allāh intended to be said on His behalf on any given matter. In any case, broadly speaking, where there is no unanimous consensus, we should not be overly dogmatic or rigid when it comes to accepting legitimate disagreements.

Arguments for closing mosques

The following are some of the Islamic justifications of the decision to close mosques en masse by scholarly bodies in several Muslim-majority countries.

Hadiths of avoiding spread of disease

The Prophet (peace and blessings be upon him) is reported to have said:

“If you hear of a disease outbreak in a land, do not go there, and if you are there during an outbreak, then do not flee from it.”[1]

“The afflicted should not be mixed with the healthy.”[2]

“Flee from leprosy like you would flee from a lion.”[3]

When it comes to prophetic instructions, one of the first things the jurist does is try to ascertain whether it is: (i) intended literally as an act of obedience (ta’abbudi), such as maghrib being prayed three rak’āt or circumambulation of the ka’ba being anti-clockwise; or (ii) intended as a fathomable means to an end (ma’qūl al-ma’nā), such as the prohibition of wine being due to its capacity for intoxication.

When it came to narrations like the above, the scholars understood them to be of the second category, that the Prophet (peace and blessings be upon him) is in fact giving those as examples of means to an underlying end—or causative effect (‘illah)—which is to isolate infectious diseases and limit their harms.

As such, if the World Health Organisation were to send people into an infectious disease outbreak zone whilst taking precautions to limit its spread, the jurist would not say this is impermissible due to the hadith of the Prophet (peace and blessings be upon him). Even though they may be going against the literal instruction of the Prophet (“do not go there”), they are taking steps to prevent the intended meaning behind the hadith—i.e. to limit the spread of the disease.

This is why in the books of fiqh we find many examples of scholars giving rulings that on the face of it go against a particular hadith of the Prophet, but upon closer inspection they are actually being faithful to the intended meaning behind the Prophet’s instruction. An example is found in child custody cases. The Prophet (peace and blessings be upon him) declared that in cases of a divorce, a small child should remain with the mother, and if she remarries then custody goes to the child’s father.

Despite the wording of the hadith, some scholars understood that this is based on an underlying ‘illah (effective cause), which is to prevent the child being neglected by a step-father or a mother busied with looking after another family. As a result, in cases where the father of the child is more likely to neglect him or her, and the step-father permits the child’s mother to nurture her child, scholars opined that the mother retains custody after remarrying, in spite of the wording of the prophetic hadith whilst being faithful to the underlying meaning transmitted by the Prophet (peace and blessings be upon him).

Therefore, the jurists agree that the intended meaning behind the narrations above is to prevent or limit the harm caused by a disease, because the Sharia intends to preserve and protect life—including health. Since the coronavirus not only infects a large number of those who come into contact with it, but leads to death and secondary and tertiary disasters such as the overwhelming and destruction of public health service capacity, the Shariah thus instructs us to do what is possible in order to prevent it and limit its harms.

Conflicting Sharia objectives: Life vs Dīn

A problem however occurs when this objective to preserve life, conflicts with another objective of the Sharia—namely to preserve the Dīn of Islām.

Medical experts have expressed the fact that the distance between you and the coronavirus is a simple handshake. Extreme Social distancing mechanisms have been implemented across many countries, and the deadly cost of delaying these measures has been seen in countries that adopted these measures after the disease started to spread more rapidly, such as Iran and Italy.

On one hand we have the call for social distancing, but on the other, the masjid wants us together; feet to feet, shoulder to shoulder. Will praying our five daily prayers and the Friday prayer in congregation lead to the virus spreading death and destruction of the public health services? The medical and epidemiology experts give us an overwhelming ‘yes’ to this question.

According to those scholars who opined to close masājid, the testimony of those experts reaches the threshold of ghalabat al-dhann—a warranted confidence in some information that the jurist will be held accountable for knowing, and thus anticipating. The medical experts have thus advised with a degree of confidence that we are responsible for anticipating, that things like Umrah and congregational prayer will indeed lead to the spreading of the virus.

But is that enough to close mosques?

Knowing that something is a potential threat to life is not automatically enough to trump any other consideration. The Sharia has, after all, legislated Jihād, which can and does lead to the loss of life. The key to understanding this is the following.

The Sharia has overall objectives that have been extracted by the scholars of Islamic law, from a holistic, inductive reading of all rulings (istiqrā’). There are various formulations, but they include the preservation of the Dīn, life, lineage, mind, wealth, and reputation.

Not just due to the fact that the Sharia has commanded things like Jihād, the scholars have understood that as an abstract objective or value, the preservation of the Dīn takes precedence over the preservation of life. However, before this can be implemented in the process of law and deriving rulings, it has to be resolved across a second dimension.

Each objective of the Sharia is broken up according to how necessary any given thing is to that objective.

A Darūra is something that is absolutely necessary to preserve that objective, its absence causing a detrimental impact on that objective. An example of this is not praying the Salāh at all, which is a Darūra for preservation of one’s Dīn.

The next level down is a Hājah, which is something you need to fulfil an objective, its absence causing hardship, but not necessarily detriment. It may lead to detriment down the line, but not immediately. An example of this is having a roof over your head, to preserve life. Not having it will be very difficult, but not an imminent threat to your life.

The third level the jurists mention is a Mukammil, which is something under normal circumstances neither necessary nor needed, but something that will assist you in achieving one of the objectives, sometimes translated as “embellishment”.

Scholars who gave the fatwa to close mosques cited that the congregational prayer falls into this third category, it is a Mukammil matter, not a Darūra nor a Hājah (under normal circumstances).

Performing the prayer in congregation assists a person in carrying out the prayer, therefore fulfilling the objective of preservation of the Dīn. If a person does not pray in congregation but still prays, he is able to preserve his Dīn. It will not be immediately detrimental to his Dīn and its preservation.

The faqīh therefore does not simply look at one dimension—Dīn vs life—but rather he looks at them combined with the second dimension, of necessity. Whilst the Darūra actions of preserving the Dīn trump the Darūra of preserving life (such as in warfare), the Darūraactions of preserving life (such as social distancing) trump the Mukammil actions of preserving Dįn (such as Ādhān and congregational prayer).

It is important to note that this is from within the Islamic legal paradigm. It is not an ‘Islām vs medicine’ or ‘dunyā vs ākhira’ binary—these are false dichotomies. From within Islām’s own legal framework, it is a religious obligation to carry out certain actions to preserve life and wealth, for example. If the mu’adhin feels (with ghalabat al-dhann) that going up a hill to give the call to prayer will lead to him getting robbed, for example, then he is told by the Islamic jurist to make the call from a safe place, even if no one will hear it. There is no guilt on him, in fact he may be rewarded for following this Islamic ruling.

What about Jumu’ah?

With regards to the Friday prayer, these scholars likewise opined that stopping it will not lead to the erosion of Dīn because the Sharia has given a replacement for it, in the form of the Dhuhrprayer, where it is not possible to observe the Friday prayer. It does not constitute an imminent threat to the preservation of the Dīn because Allāh has given a replacement (badal) for it, and there is a maxim in Islamic law that “When the default is excused, the replacement is moved to.”

Other general evidences

In addition to the above those who opined to close mosques on account of the coronavirus outbreak refer to other supporting evidences.

Among them are the statements of Allāh:

“And Allāh wants to lighten for you [your difficulties]; and mankind was created weak.”[4]

“And strive for Allāh with the striving due to Him. He has chosen you and has not placed upon you in the religion any difficulty.”[5]

“And do not throw yourselves into destruction with your own hands…”[6]

Among them is the legal principle “Harm must be removed,” which is taken from the hadith of the Prophet (peace and blessings be upon him), “There should be no harm nor the reciprocation of harm.”[7]

Those who were against the closure of mosques

It is important to remember that despite the dominant discourse in the public mind being a false dichotomy between absolute lockdown on one hand, and business as usual on the other, those scholars who opined that mosques should not be closed en masse did NOT argue for simply doing nothing, as some have misunderstood.

It is true that some people without knowledge have taken a condemnable course of action of being negligent with regards to their responsibilities to limit the harms of this virus—which is as we have explained an Islamic obligation. What is more condemnable is using the great Islamic value of Tawakkul (reliance on and trust in Allāh) as an excuse for negligence. Instead of tawakkul those who are negligent of their duties are infact carrying out Tawākul, which is a misregard for taking necessary means to achieve a goal.

However, the scholars of Islām are far removed from this tiny minority and their actions. The scholars who argued against wholesale mosque closures called upon an axiomatic truth that if something gravely important can be reduced instead of eliminated, then opportunities for reduction should be exhausted before elimination. All scholars encouraged the taking of all reasonable medical precautions, however differed simply on what the most effective way to balance all the competing considerations is.

For example, even the scientific experts advising the UK government were in “heated debates” regarding the correct time and extent to implement social distancing.[8] Doing it too late could mean the disease would spread too quickly, doing it too early could mean a burden on people leading them to slack and risking a more dangerous ‘second peak’.

Likewise, scholars and mosque leaders contemplate other measures to reduce the numbers of people gathering, such as making a bare minimum congregation of two or three local individuals, whilst remaining effectively ‘closed’ to the public. This is partly why this is a jurisdictional matter. Different cities have different disease rates, infrastructures and social norms, which mean different strategies to combat the spread of the virus.

On top of that, the scholars remind us of an important theological point, that there are unseen, divine causes for the removal of calamities, and Salāh is one of them. So as a result of their ijtihād on this issue they might have used some form of prayer in mosques (with medical precautions) as a means to receive divine help and mercy as part of a comprehensive strategy for protection and cure. Not to mention considering the future political ramifications of setting a precedent of closing mosques down en masse.

As mentioned earlier, the jurist has to consider multiple angles at once. In any case, the scholars of Islām should not be accused of lacking the necessary jurisprudence insights when studying this matter, and condoning a “business as usual” approach.

Conclusion

Difference of opinion is a mercy for the Ummah of Muhammad (peace and blessings be upon him). But at the same time, being united despite differences is also a mercy, and being disunited is a punishment.[9] That which the scholars of this ummah agree on vastly outweighs that which they disagree over.

We are in unprecedented times so it is understandable to have unprecedented fatwas and unprecedented levels of confusion among the masses. However, do not let Shaytān make you depressed or focus on relatively trivial matters compared to the greater goal of glorifying Allāh and relying on Him first and foremost, whilst working together to make your communities and societies as safe as possible.

Use this opportunity to go back to Allāh, to flee to Him, and beg him for forgiveness, since He gave us a taste of something beloved to us and Him being taken away from us—the congregational prayers—no doubt to test us. Make the most of this time of social distancing and implement the guidance of the scholars who have told us how to pray in our homes during this trial, and make our homes into masājid glorifying Allāh.[10]

Notes:

[1] Bukhari & Muslim

[2] Muslim

[3] Bukhari

[4] Al-Qur’ān 4:28

[5] Al-Qur’ān 22:78

[6] Al-Qur’ān 2:195

[7] Ibn Mājah

[8] https://www.buzzfeed.com/alexwickham/10-days-that-changed-britains-coronavirus-approach

[9] The Prophet (peace and blessings be upon him) said: “The community is a mercy, whilst disunity is a punishment.” [Ahmed]

ABOUT SHAYKH SAJID UMARS

Sheikh Sajid Ahmed Umar initially pursued a degree in IT, graduating with a first class result. He went on to successfully open an IT business. Alongside his contemporary studies, Sheikh Sajid completed the memorization of the Qur'an at the age of 18. Subsequently, he turned his attention towards Islamic Studies. He completed a 3-year University Diploma in Arabic language and Islamic Sciences at Imaam Muhammed bin Saud Islamic University, he later attained a Bachelors degree in Sharī'ah and thereafter a Masters degree in Judiciary (Qadha), with a first class honours, from the Higher Institute for Judiciary Studies (Ma'had al-'āli li'l-Qa'dhā). He trained as a judge and successfully completed a thesis on the topic of Liquidity Management using the famous Repurchase Agreement (REPO) contract, as well as its rulings and permitted alternatives. He is now pursuing his PhD in the Higher Institute of Judiciary at Al-Imam University. Sheikh Sajid has played an integral part in Islamic academic development worldwide he has authored several articles and dissertations in both Arabic and English pertaining to the Islamic Sciences; lectures at Knowledge International University; is Director of Islamic Development for Mercy Mission World; lectures at AlKauthar Institute and is Chief Islamic Editor for a magazine among various other commendable endeavours.